Jose Canseco Loses a Finger, While Daniel Colman Wags One at Hellmuth

Jose Canseco Loses a Finger, While Daniel Colman Wags One at Hellmuth

Resigned MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) throughout a poker competition last week.

Jose Canseco was the figure that is central a weekend for the poker world which was filled with fingers: some lost, some pointed at prominent names within the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he seems to have lost the same little finger for the next time in about a month, a thing that few individuals (with any luck) will ever get to experience.

In late October, Canseco ended up being in the news for inadvertently shooting himself in the hand. According to Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleaning his weapon in their kitchen. He wound up shooting their little finger, which then must be surgically reattached. It appears some surgeons are more skilled than other people at digital fixes, however.

Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament

Based on a tweet sent down by Canseco on Friday, but, the hand became detached again while he was playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening.

‘ I became playing in a poker tournament final night and my hand dropped of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video of it.’

Fortunately, Canseco didn’t post that video, though there is at least one supposed image of his finger before it dropped off. As gruesome once the incident may sound, however, Canseco said that this result may have been inevitable from the time he shot himself.

‘My hand should have been amputated right from the start,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was very loose with no bone to connect it. It ended up being additionally smelling actually bad.’

There was no word on whether or not Canseco won the hand to produce up for losing the little finger. Formerly, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during his 17-year league that is major as being a professional baseball player, during which he hit 462 house runs.

Colman Offers Hellmuth the Verbal Finger

Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly attached, of their own at 13-time World Series of Poker bracelet winner Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some harsh comments about Hellmuth in a thread concerning the latter’s present appearance on a podcast hosted by Rounders writer Brian Koppelman.

‘Its embarrassing that we need certainly to share our profession with whores like this person,’ Colman wrote. ‘he immediately comes on stage to shake my hand in front of a camera and congratulate me after I win one drop. Just as if he’s the gatekeeper towards the poker world and welcoming me in.

‘It is truly pathetic that the 40 old would behave the way he does at the table, not to mention how spineless he is, just willing to take any sponsorship regardless of the company’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on year. ‘ Really makes me unfortunate to think there’s a chance some people may look up to this charlatan. Individuals of his mindset and character are a cancer to this global globe.’

Hellmuth was apparently hurt and surprised by the reviews, and responded briefly to them on Twitter.

‘Ouch, we was simply assaulted time that is big a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal and it hurts, but I am proud of the man I am!’

For his component, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was a touch too harsh, and made a decision to back the tone off of his post, also if he stood behind the message.

‘we acknowledge to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of the message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘Having said that, I still stand by the gist that is main of post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I also don’t believe it belongs in this game.’

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver claims that US sports that are legal should be regulated in the us. (Image: USATSI)

Can appropriate US recreations betting, across the board, ever be a thing? a proponent that is surprising emerged in the shape of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.

Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The ny Times recently, stating that he thinks it’s time to allow sports gambling to take place legally through the United States. That stance is in opposition to that of most major sports organizations in the united states, including the previously held position by the NBA and its commissioner that is former Stern.

‘Betting on professional sports happens to be unlawful in most of the United States outside of Nevada,’ Silver said in the beginning of his opinion piece. ‘we believe we require a different sort of approach.’

Currently Prohibited in Most States

Silver went on to describe the state that is current of gambling in the USA.

In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that already had some form of the betting available. Nevada could be the state that is only full activities betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon have the proper to offer more restricted forms of sports-based gambling.

As Silver states, the NBA, as well as other activities leagues and companies in the US, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing sports wagering for decades. But who hasn’t stopped individuals from gambling on the games, whatever the lack of a legal, regulated option.

‘But despite appropriate restrictions, sports gambling is widespread,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving underground company that runs free from regulation or oversight. Because there are few appropriate possibilities, those who wish to bet resort to illicit bookmaking operations and shady offshore internet sites.’

Based on Silver, some estimates place the volume of illegal recreations wagering within the United States at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per 12 months. That dwarfs the amount of legal recreations betting that takes place in vegas gambling enterprises and other locations in Nevada.

Trends Aim Towards Regulation

In the piece, Silver writes in regards to the ‘domestic and worldwide trends’ towards regulation of sports betting. He highlights that many states now offer at least some kind of legal gambling, and that online gambling had been managed in three states. Because of this, he says, it’s the perfect time for Congress to enact laws that are new replace PASPA.

‘Congress should adopt a federal framework that allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, subject to strict regulatory requirements and technological safeguards,’ he wrote.

Silver has previously made comments suggesting he would be interested in seeing regulated sports wagering in the us, though this is the time that is first has presented his position in full. Other sports leagues declined to touch upon Silver’s stance.

Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance

However, at least one NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told that ‘Adam has it exactly right.’

‘In the past for PR reasons, we have put up token resistance to them,’ Cuban stated. ‘I accept Adam that now’s the time to take sports betting out of the shadows and deal it is. with it like the huge business’

Despite Silver’s reviews, however, New Jersey shouldn’t expect the NBA to grab of the lawsuit that is aiming to stop the state from allowing activities betting to go on at its gambling enterprises and racetracks.

‘Without a comprehensive solution that is federal state measures such as brand New Jersey’s recent initiative is going to be both unlawful and bad general public policy,’ Silver had written.

Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson Internet Poker Ban Plan

Ron Paul laid out his arguments against an online gambling ban that is strongly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)

Ron Paul has used their weekly column for the Ron Paul Institute to casino slot game quick hits argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of Americans and will be taken up only for the advantage of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.

The previous Republican Representative from Texas called legislation that is such example of ‘cronyism,’ one thing he states that many Americans are against aside from their political ideologies.

‘For instance, Congress may soon vote on legislation Internet that is outlawing gambling’ Paul had written.

‘It is an open secret, at least in the Beltway, that this legislation is being thought to be an opt to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, whom could very well be best known for using their enormous wealth to advance a pro-war international policy, is now utilizing his political impact to turn his online competitors into criminals.’

Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March

Paul’s words refer to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that ended up being introduced by Republicans in both homely homes of Congress in March, and it has since selected up tiny but notable amounts of bipartisan support in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw many forms of on the web gambling at the level that is federal basically changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just recreations betting, as it is currently interpreted.

Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the various reasons provided for supporting the ban in an effort to show it was really only being considered for the sake of Adelson.

‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are inspired with a desire to curry favor with a rich donor,’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they provide a amount of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some declare that legalizing online gambling will even enrich criminals and terrorists! But criminalizing online gambling enterprises will not eradicate the demand for online casinos. Alternatively, passage of this legislation will likely guarantee that the online gambling marketplace is managed by crooks.’

Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument

Certainly one of the major (and to many, perplexing) arguments utilized by supporters of RAWA is such a ban would actually protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying down their thinking for why it was faulty.

‘Their argument is citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get those laws around by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul claimed. ‘ No matter if the argument had merit that allowing states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it will never justify legislation that is federal the issue…arguing that ‘states liberties’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which ended up being intended to limit federal energy, on its head.’

Paul organized several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing their opposition to a gambling ban that is online.

‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is an infringement that is blatantly unconstitutional our liberties that will probably expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of most, it is all being done for the main benefit of one powerful billionaire.’

RAWA is unlikely to receive a hearing or see much movement in Congress during the current lame duck session. However, its prospects could improve into the Congress that is next Republicans will have majorities both in your house and Senate.

Deixe aqui seu comentário.

Você deve estar logado para postar um comentário.